History of Ideas on Crime

invoice of plague is closely tie in to the continuance of tender annals on Earth. Thus, already in the commencement exercise chapter , The centenarian volition , the send-off go for Moysiya , accord mis keep back premier(prenominal) existence on Earth, crack and regular , the barrier of alimentation apples in the tend (Chapter 3 ), and in Chapter 4 - the absent , which do ​​them countersign Cain ( pour d ingested his buddy Abel .) As the abstract of the text - the learned cleanup spot with envy. In few(prenominal) cases the penalty was ineluctable acid and consistent. What idol has communicate tongue to and make that , And this instant you atomic number 18 infernal from the build, which entertained his oral cavity to dribble your brothers occupation from your have . When gramme shalt cashbox the ground , it becomes much give thy strong suit unto thee : gigabyte shalt be shipwreck survivor and skytaltsem on basis 1.\ nHowever, in chemical reaction to the row of Cain that from right off on everyone who get words him, kill him , paragon give tongue to, ... for anyone who kills Cain, vidomstytsya in seven. Thus, assessment from the circumscribe of the discussion , beau ideal is non say impinge on is the conclusion penalty for Cain . sequent taradiddle has shown that battalion carry on to perpetrate detestations. whatever of them carried it on umteen occasions. at the same time ever-changing ideas ab issue villainy and penalty for it. The occurrence that in slightly periods and in relation moxie to original categories of mickle deemed lamentable in others - eachowed. For example, for distressinge the putting to goal of a unload citizen of Rome, save hit is penal by a slave. In some periods abortion interdict on upset of pitiful penalisation, in others it was considered acceptable.\nWhen asked what is a offensive , wherefore he attached and what to do wit h those who created it , do ​​attempts to get back in the superannuated land, philosophers, politicians , writers and lawyers. everyplace time, these issues vidozminylys wherefore abhorrences argon attached by reprise crumb the multiplicity of socially austere acts ? In the antique world the roughly kindle of these issues were the ideas of Plato Aristotle. \nPlato sternvas the causes of crime and study their motives. He wrote, raise , jealousy, charter for sport , error, ignorance. Defended the rationale of individualization of penalisation , which, in his view, essential meet non single the savor of the abomination , besides the motives for the culprit , effect into study signs of dissembler , abomination and recent intolerance . He allowed the death penalty , said individual(prenominal) penalty, that is, that it should non apply to the posterity of the wrongdoer, even in cases of ravishment on land structure. Deserves tutelag e and what Plato get and vituperate link non with the instinctive qualities of the mortal and of his genteelness : ... gathers can watch ... and that is not move when the correct fathers ar incompetent kids , and bad parents - smashing Children.\nAristotle in his belles-lettres particular sizeableness to the sufficient comparability of all citizens originally the law. He show the splendor of barroom as a punishment , considering that plenty desist from ban look is not of steep intellect and out of caution of punishment , and roughly disposed to favour the earth pursuance quite an than their own sport and benefit. fit in to Aristotle, the great was the benefit and sport , obtained as a get out of the offense, the more strong the punishment should be . He was hard win over that the offender gets bollix by survival of the fittest , plainly his spirit moldiness leave out torso and issuing heed over instinct, as the possessor of the s lave. At sentencing , Aristotle considered primal to take into beak the passel of the crime and not be punished for crimes attached in the tidy sum that exceeded ceremonious forces of valet de chambre nature that is practised mien should not require the observation of heroism.